Facebook Icon Twitter Icon YouTube Icon Google Plus Icon LinkedIn Icon

A Decision by a Heart & Lung Arbitrator is Not Binding in a Workers’ Comp Proceeding.

April 3rd, 2017

In Merrell v. WCAB, 2017 WL 1210197 (April 3, 2017), the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held that a decision by a Heart & Lung  arbitrator that a claimant was disabled and thus entitled to Heart & Lung benefits was not binding on the Workers’ Compensation Judge.

The Commonwealth Court held that there is a two part inquiry when considering whether Collateral Estoppel applies to a Workers’ Comp proceeding; the amount of risk and the governing procedures in the two proceedings.  The Commonwealth Court held that the amount of risk involved in a Heart & Lung arbitration and a workers’ compensation proceeding are substantially different because Heart & Lung benefits cease once a disability is deemed to be permanent whereas workers’ compensation benefits can last a lifetime.

In addition, the court held that the procedures in a Heart & Lung arbitration are much less formal, and therefore substantially different than a workers’ compensation proceeding.  Opinion by Leavitt, P.J.

 

From the first meeting Ryan made me feel very comfortable, like I had known him for years. He made the whole process so easy to understand. He was also very flexible with appointments and times and very considerate of my time. I never expected it all to go so smoothly but Ryan went above and beyond the call of duty to take any additional pressure off of me.